Navigating Evaluation Design: A Manager's Guide to Crafting Effective Evaluations
As a manager tasked with overseeing evaluations, understanding how to develop a robust evaluation design is crucial for gathering insightful data and answering key evaluation questions effectively.
5/3/20242 min read


Evaluation design delineates the methodology for data collection and analysis, providing a roadmap for evaluating the success and impact of projects or programs. In this blog post, we'll explore the essential factors to consider when crafting an evaluation design and outline the pathways available to managers depending on their level of expertise and involvement.
Key factors in evaluation design:
1. The nature of what is evaluated:
- Consider whether the evaluation involves complex aspects or challenges such as delays in impact visibility or barriers to data collection accuracy.
- Assess the intricacies of the project or program under evaluation to tailor the design accordingly.
2. The nature of the evaluation:
- Identify the key evaluation questions (KEQs) and determine when answers are needed to inform decision-making.
- Align the evaluation design with the specific goals and objectives of the evaluation, ensuring relevance and clarity.
3. Available resources and constraints:
- Evaluate the resources at your disposal, including budget, existing data, expertise, and technical equipment.
- Address any constraints, such as the requirement to use common indicators or limitations in accessing key informants or data.
Pathways for developing evaluation design:
1. Evaluator-driven design:
- Engage a competent evaluation expert, either internal, external or a combination thereof.
- Collaborate with the evaluator to ensure a thorough understanding of the important factors influencing the evaluation design.
- Develop an Evaluation Matrix detailing how each KEQ will be addressed through data collection and analysis.
2. Manager-driven design:
- Acquire a comprehensive understanding of the critical factors influencing the evaluation design.
- Craft an evaluation design that aligns with the identified factors and addresses specific needs and objectives.
- Summarize the design using an Evaluation Matrix, illustrating the approach for answering each KEQ.
Ensuring quality and credibility:
1. Technical review:
- Before finalising the design, seek a technical review by independent evaluators with expertise in various evaluation methods and designs.
- Ensure the reviewers are well-versed in the context of the evaluation to provide relevant and situation-specific advice.
2. Review by evaluation management structure:
- Obtain formal organizational review and endorsement of the design by an evaluation steering committee.
- Facilitate a data rehearsal with primary intended users to gauge the appropriateness of the design and refine potential findings.
- Present mock-ups of tables, graphs, and quotes representing different scenarios to validate the credibility and relevance of the evaluation design.
Crafting an effective evaluation design requires careful consideration of various factors, including the nature of the evaluation, available resources, and stakeholder involvement. By following the outlined pathways and ensuring quality assurance measures, managers can develop evaluation designs that yield valuable insights and drive informed decision-making processes.